About Me

My photo
Currently I am a student at the University of Waterloo studying International Development in the faculty of Environment. Because of my fiendish behaviour towards snow, and my affinity for strapping a board on my feet and letting gravity guide me down steep pitches, i always believed I would find my way out West for a university experience with as much school work as snowboarding. I ended up at Waterloo, however, because of the unique International Development program that specializes in sustainability. This program will also take me to Vietnam in September for an internship with a small environmental NGO. If a university program can deter me from winters spent in the Rockies, i must be here for a reason!

Wednesday 23 March 2011

Pee Poo Genius

PeePoople Genius!


peepoo5.jpg




   In Developing nations that require prompt action to assure the prosperity of its people, land and culture, one must not start at such a large scale—Infrastructure, governmental revolutions and other such grand plans are not going to work. Not yet.  Smaller scale, simple, local projects that will make an immediate differences that are measurable to the people/land it is helping are the way to begin the crisis of over and under development on this planet.
            The Millennium Development Goals proposed by the United Nations outline a strong need for the participation of economically prosperous countries to alleviate many development issues amongst third world countries.  Hygiene and Sanitation issues have been determining factors in many of the issues discussed in the millennium development goals such as: child mortality, health, and environmental sustainability.
            PeePoople is a Non Government Organization that has taken the idea of simple, small and local into great consideration with their innovative product to help with the sanitation of urine and fecal matter: the Peepoo bag.  The Peepoo bag is essentially a single use toilet that does not demand any sort of water flow infrastructure, or structure at all. It is a personal bag that measures 14 by 38 centimeters in which people who lack the everyday amenity of a toilet can use to safely dispose of urinary and fecal matter.  The materials of the bag contain enzymes that react with urine and feces that raise the PH levels of the material, allowing natural hygeinisation to begin. Dangerous Pathogens found in urine and feces are killed after two to four days in the Peepoo bag, which would otherwise end up infecting nearby groundwater, streams and ponds.  These bags then biodegrade and act as fertilizer to the land they occupy. 
            Currently these bags are made from 45% reused materials, and have a fairly low cost of production.  The cost however is not low enough—developing nations have not yet adopted this method of sanitation, nor have they been educated of its usages and benefits.
           Let's get this out there!

Do we have the right to measure poverty?

   "The poor themselves—the only set of people who can realistically make a difference—are often left out of the discussion" -Imprint



  We have homes, cars and wireless internet on our smart phones that allow us to access all the information in the world. We have it all, we know it all—or so we believe.  We study, then we solve—we study poverty: the vicious cycle, how small businesses can alleviate monetary stress, and other solutions. We donate.  We then go overseas and preach; telling small villages they have it all ‘wrong’, and to ‘know their rights.’ We have never experienced extreme poverty, therefore we don’t have the knowledge to teach about poverty. Only the people living the life of the poor have the knowledge, we simply know the stats and figures.  We need to learn from people, not from our textbooks about how poverty is affecting their lives, their families’ lives and the lives of generations to come.  Let us learn the truth so we can utilize all of the resources we so fortunately have access to, to get to the root of the issue of poverty. 
   Measuring poverty is one of the most challenging things to do—especially to people who are unaccustomed to experiencing what poverty is.  There are classifications used to measure certain aspects of poverty, such as: income poverty, relative poverty, human poverty and absolute poverty.  But how do these categories compare to basic human needs?  Shelter, health, hygiene, safety, nutrition, social involvement and respect are all aspects of life no one should be expected to live without.  Measuring poverty is always a problem, especially if you recognize that just using money is not enough.
   Our global free market has offered many successes and many collapses to our world’s economic situation.  Whichever side you find yourself pertaining to, the globalization of our marketplace has significantly increased the gap between ‘rich’ and ‘poor’ in our world.  Lesser-developed countries were forced to open their economies to the global marketplace and the result was parlous competition.  With every country struggling for economic prosperity, it became a competition between states of the global south to provide lower standards, reduced wages and cheaper resources to any country that would invest.  This spiraling race to the bottom only increased the power and wealth of more developed nations and lessened the capability of lesser-developed countries to prosper economically.


Show me where the money's going

 Business: the rise and demise of our globalized world.  From an international development standpoint, we are taught to challenge large businesses: to identify their potentially corrupt means of attaining wealth.  However, with the creation of large corporate businesses also came many great things; comfortable lifestyles, lucrative employment opportunities, evolving technologies...aspects of our social society we are all quite dependant upon. With this rise in overall living standards came a rise in excess, (another word ‘indevians’ are weary about) but even excess does not have to be thought of as bad—excess money can mean charitable donations, philanthropic generosity and humans helping humans—This was the original jist of Aid: giving away excess to help those whom don’t have enough. So how is it that aid has now turned into a business, (the kind that makes us cringe)? 
            Aid has become a business—not the kind of business fostering the evolution of social society, economic growth and living standards, but the fraudulent kind that needs to be obliged to a transparent operating system and under public scrutiny.  If people are giving their money, it should be imperative that they are able to track its progress all the way through to its beneficiaries. Because of the precarious reputation of aid distribution, people are becoming reluctant to donate, and official aid is at the lowest it has been the past twenty years.  

thoughts while looking around my room, feverishly typing on my mac

   As Canadians, we don’t directly suffer from HIV/AIDS, malaria, or tuberculosis epidemics, for the most part. Here, in the Developed world, we have created our own epidemic—the spread of affluenza.  Affluenza is described as: the unsustainable addiction to over consumption and materialism exhibited in the lifestyles of affluent consumers in Canada and other countries. Affluenza is the main cause of overconsumption in our lives.  It is the dissatisfaction with what material possessions one owns, and the yearning for more. It seems ironic that epidemics in developing countries are caused by lack of resources and material objects such as contraceptives, hygiene products and medicines/vaccinations, whereas our epidemic is the exact opposite.  As residents of a developed country, we are damaging the earth and depleting its resources, not to mention poisoning our bodies with an excess of material objects and our incessant desire for even more. In order for humans to begin to repair the damage done we must re-evaluate our primitive urge to compete with one another, the harm we are inflicting on the earth by overconsuming, and ways to live a simpler, less disruptive lifestyle.
            As a child, battling my older sister for her toy was an everyday enterprise, as a preteen, obtaining the trendiest jeans was a must. Out shining others is a natural human quality instilled at some point in our early lives.  However, its not just humans; beyond our species, competition reaches the realm of the animal and plant kingdoms. As Darwin once explained: in order to survive, trees grow taller to consume more sunlight than their shorter neighbours, their roots grow deeper to seep up more water than the vegetation beside it—our world revolves around competition.  Nowadays, however, competition is different than simply competing for survival.   Larger homes, bigger cars, brand names, and globalized corporations; competition’s new motto is “the bigger the better”.  Affluence, is, without doubt a major cause of overconsumption in the developed world—people filling the void of their empty lives by purchasing material goods for temporary satisfaction.  Affluence is essentially competition.  If humans were not competing with one another, there would be no need for excess.  Nice cars would not be a valued possession—an old jalopy could suit anyone’s transportation needs, assuming the car worked properly.  What are 10 watches, when you only need one to tell the time? Because we feel the need to show others our social status and success and compete with one another in these categories, we are overconsuming. 
   We are consumers.  Every living thing, takes some sort of materials from the earth in order to survive—the earth can support this kind of consumption.  Over consumption is when a species takes more than is directly necessary for use, or more than the earth can sustainably provide.  Humans in developed countries have mastered this phenomenon. The earth cannot support everyone in the manner to which Americans have become accustomed. Over consuming has catastrophic impacts on our natural environment: it has caused the degradation of many of the earth’s natural resources, decreased the quality of life for people living in third world countries, and it is even serving the over consumers more harm than supposed therapeutic relief.  The destruction of natural habitat is occurring all around the world to make way for industry, mass farming, and other development—all to feed our need to consume.   The deterioration of North American resources is probably the most noticeable damage to the over consuming population. However, even with damage being done so close to home, perhaps even under the floor of your home, most consumers have no idea of the impact their purchases have on the environment.  We have destroyed more than fifty percent of our wetlands, ninety percent of our old growth forests, ninety nine percent of tall grass prairie and over four hundred and ninety species of native plants and animals.  As people of developed countries spend more money, and purchase more material goods, we use more of the earth’s resources and leave less for people who cannot pay the sums of money we can, and for people in future generations. Since the nineteen fifties, Americans have consumed more resources than; the entire third world population, the Romans during the age of the Roman empire and every human being who lived prior to this time.  It seems, really, that no good is coming from over consumption—one would assume that the only party winning in this battle is the consumers themselves.  However, studies show that people who have consciously made an effort to cut back on consumption habits are happier than people who have not. Why are more people not joining in?

Noble Winter: what's in a name?

   In Vietnamese class the other day we were asked to choose our Viet names.  I didn't realize this is why at the University of Waterloo there are so many Peggy's, Destiny's and Holly's who do not look as though they come from places in the world where these names exist.  I didn't realize when you move to a different Country, you get to choose your own name.  Some people choose the equivalent to their name in the new country's language, however Vietnamese doesn't exactly provide you with this option.  In Vietnam, names are formulated by words with associated meanings, names like chrysanthemum and warrior.  It troubled me however, that i could not choose a name such as 'loyal soldier,' because Viet names are extremely gender sensitive.
   I immediately saw this as a culture flaw: how can men and women expect to be of equal social status when women are names after precious jems and flowers, and men after ferocious animals and fighters?  I pitied myself as I scanned the names and tried to come up with one that was of feminine orientation, but had some sort of edge to it.  'Noble Winter' was the best I could do, but ideally i would have gone for something more along the lines of 'aggressive lion.'  As I felt for the Vietnamese women growing up under the identity of a precious stone, i wondered the meaning behind my own name, of French decent given to me by my Canadian parents.
   Margot, much to my shock and surprise, the name I have lived with my entire life means 'Pearl!'  A gem from the earth, strung around women's necks as a sign of sophistication and economic status!  After a moment of dismay came a glimpse of clarity: I have been living my life for my entire life named after a pearl, and never, not once have  I felt inferior to a male or someone with a different name.
   A name is not a label, it isn't even an identity, no matter what country you're in.  A name is simply a name.

Tuesday 22 March 2011

If i saw you in an elevator, this is what I would say..


I am Margot Phillips, also known as cao quý mùa đông, which means ‘noble winter’ in my Vietnamese class.  I am taking Vietnamese because come September, I am going to be living and working for an environmental NGO in Vietnam.  Pan Nature is an NGO that works to bring economic prosperity and environmental sustainability to communities in Vietnam that struggle through daily life. These communities lack access to the household amenities that we take for granted, such as primary education, potable water, and public sewage systems.  I want to be an international ambassador for Pan Nature by bringing my learning’s from Vietnam back to Canada, through my blog.  I hope to inspire Canadians to realize their privileged lifestyles and encourage them to donate some of that privilege to Pan Nature and their efforts for change. In order for my voice to be loud enough to spark change, I need as much support as I can get. I have much to teach, but even more to learn. Follow my adventure, my voice, and my lessons at noblewinter.blogger.com.